Introduction

The title of this blog refers to a collection of essays by French theorist Roland Barthes, 'Image, music, text', which includes the seminal 'Death of the Author', upon the relevance of which I shall later dwell. At this point I shall only note, that the transition from reader to perceiver to author, is of the utmost importance in my further writings.
The focus of this blog will lie primarily in the field of sound arts practice, but by no means exclude art in any media, should its content be of interest to me. Therefore, within these pages you may expect to find everything from experimental music and noise to sculpture and installation, and essays and books to visual art and video art, alongside such sound arts as acousmatic music, interactive instruments, soundscape composition, sound performance and installation, visual and conceptual scores, and all that lies between and beyond.
Its purpose is to document art that I encounter, and describe my experience of it. The importance lies within the concept, and how I as an individual perceive it, in the hope of building wider discussions with any of my readers, who may interact differently, or similarly, and to ultimately assess the level of which our backgrounds, education or experience affect our viewing and listening.
As I begin this journey, I will be reviewing and rewriting previous notes I have made on this topic, posting a variety of essays I have written in the past, and my own ventures in sound. Due to the quantity of this, it is impractical for me to post chronologically. However, once this task of sorting through my past relationship with art dwindles, my posts to this blog will be regular, discuss projects, which are current, and will be chronological to the date when I discover the topic in question.
I include a search bar, where exhibitions, artists, and key words may be searched for within this blog, to simplify the process for the blogee.Please do not hesitate to contact me with any comments or enquiries, I would be most curious to hear them.

Thursday, 16 February 2012

Part 4 of 6, The active listener: Fluxus experience and the recent rebirth of interactive music



George Brecht: 1957-64 Composition

  George Brecht wrote a text in 1957 entitled Chance-Imagery, which traced the role of chance in mathematics and science and related it to philosophy considering, amongst others the pivotal concepts of Jackson Pollock[1], and describing a formula for generating chance in visual art. Brecht initially enrolled in John Cage's experimental composition class following communications with Cage on the subject of these ‘chance determined processes’. His interest in aleatoricism continued through his experiments in Cage's class, where he directed these investigations towards the compilation of sounds. As early as 1959, Brecht composed Card Piece for Voices, where cards are shuffled to determine both the sequences of lyrics, and note pitches on which the lyrics are sung.
The Event score originates with George Brecht, who constructed worded motifs on small pieces of card and presented them in Cage's classes, to initiate a discussion based around the possibilities each idea presented. Brecht notes: 'the score is an event; so is the finding an incident of it. In composing music, the composer permits an experience by arranging a situation in which sound arises. If a musical score (sound-score) prepares a musical (sound) situation, the event-score prepares one for events in all dimensions'[2]. In Brecht's Event scores, the initial idea is minimalistic, so as not to impose but inspire artistic expression in an action.
An illustrative example is his 1962 Event score Concerto for Orchestra, (fig. 13) which reads 'exchanging'. The encounterer may follow this in any means, as the object is not provided. The score is comprised of a single word, and the lack of a supporting sentence gives it an abstract quality, highlighting its conceptual value. The use of a verb, instead of a noun, presents it as not an instruction but a continuous action. The implication is to explore the possibilities of the action, not to arrive at a given outcome. The isolation of this single word provides a distance, which shows the nature of the Event score to be a contemplative, personal, and simplistic experience. In the form the participant chooses to execute the score, he reveals something about himself, rather than becoming simply a tool through which the composer can dictate his message. Such forms of Event scores are like mini experiments to gain knowledge and an understanding both of our behaviour, and of our environment.
Concerto for Orchestra presents an abundance of choices: what is to be exchanged - a physical object, or a communication, gesture, handshake; with whom is 'it' to be exchanged? The title of the composition provides a setting, participants and props, but does not contribute guidance for actions. Although the title suggests a sonic outcome, the body of the score does not confirm this. As previous Fluxus scores have focused on indeterminate sound, it could be construed that the 'concerto' is composed of all sounds within the time the performer chooses. Alternatively 'exchanging' could refer to an exchange of notes, phrases or melodies and motifs, using the instruments of the orchestra. In observing the choices the performer makes in realising the score, we are offered a glimpse of their person.
As George Maciunas began to organise festivals for Fluxus Events, Brecht composed variations on his scores with specific performance instructions called 'Fluxversions'. These adaptations are no longer an exploration of a situation, but a theatrical exposition of a theme. Fluxversions are indebted to the Futurist movement, which introduced a free form of theatre.
The Futurist movement was launched by Filippo Marinetti (1876-1944), in a Manifesto published in the French newspaper Le Figaro in 1909. Futurists introduced the noise of machinery into the context of music, as they admired the industrial advances of humanity over nature. In 1913 Luigi Russolo built large scale instruments called 'itonarumori', which generated noise resembling the sounds of technology, exploiting the contrast between sounds that machines can produce over the capabilities of traditional instruments, which Futurists dismissed as limited and belonging to an era long gone. In theatre, Futurists rejected all traditional dramatic genres and scenographies, as banal or irrelevant, in its place laying emphasis on movement and gesture. Futurists engaged in crude parodies and harsh ridicule both as an attack against the stereotypical bourgeois audience of theatre, and to condemn conventional theatrical content. The Futurists sought to empower their audiences through this open form of theatre.
Brecht’s Fluxversions are designed to provoke the audience, as each is highly unexpected and left completely unexplained. Some Fluxversions are designed to parody the rituals and traditions of Western music, others poke fun at the role of the audience. Each is a large protest on a small scale.
Concerto for Orchestra, Fluxversion 2, mocks the traditional concert situation. In asking the players to exchange their scores, Brecht objects to the form of traditional concert recital where an orchestra faithfully recreates the piece of music. Through this he redefines the concept of a music performance, exchanging the conventional mode of repetition of a score for his updated model of interactivity.
Fluxversion 3 takes the form of a game. The orchestra is divided to create two war-like fronts, wind musicians against the strings, in a lurid, farcical battle. As the orchestra manoeuvre their instruments in combat as weapons, only the conductor retains his dignified status, allowed to rule supreme as the judge. This caricature of the traditional orchestra ensemble remonstrates against Viennese institutions. Brecht plants a further humorous twist in the deconstruction of the word 'concerto' which derives from the Latin 'concertare'. This can mean either 'to dispute' or 'to work together', revealing Brecht's inspiration for the score.
Octet for Winds (1964) also divides the performers into opposing 'teams' challenging them in a childlike competition. Here, a vat or basin filled with water is in the central position, and wind musicians gather around the perimeter facing each other, holding their instruments at the ready. A toy sailboat is placed in the water, and it becomes each performers quest to blow through their instruments with enough strength to puff the boat to an opposing 'shore', whilst simultaneously playing 'some popular tune'. The infantile joy and innocence in this piece is made absurd by the context proposed by the title, again ridiculing the traditional orchestra.
In a feature section for the August 1962 edition of Stars and Stripes, the US Airforce newspaper, the Fluxus artists Benjamin Patterson and Emmett Williams succeeded in publishing some Fluxus propaganda. Williams plays the role of interviewer to a comically mad Patterson, who retaliates to a question with: "What do you mean is it music? Of course it's music. It's performed on a musical instrument, it's taking place in a concert hall, and I'm a trained musician!"[3]. In listing the materials necessary to become a musician (one instrument, one concert hall, one title), Patterson satirises elitist customs.
Brecht uses water as an instrument in his Event Drip Music (1962). This performance documents the sound of water falling from elevated vessel into another. 'Drip' connotes a miniscule happening, and in its small size, gains the audiences' attention. In minimising the sound in quantity and amplitude, Brecht zooms in on the concept of the alert and focused listener. This piece was initially explored using vials and pipettes from a laboratory as Brecht earned a living as a chemist for some time (fig. 14). As with the Fluxversion, he expanded the action from its minimalist essence and converted it into a more accessible performance: figure 15 shows Dick Higgins stood on a ladder with a bucket on the ground and watering can in hand. As with many Fluxus events, the execution was simple, practical, brief, and used mass-produced objects, encouraging the audience to focus solely on everyday sounds. It demonstrates the do-it-yourself attitude towards music that Fluxus artists employ to involve the audience.



 


[1] George Brecht: Events - A Heterospective, Alfred Fischer, Julia Robinson and Kasper Konig, (Museum Ludwig, Köln, 2006), page 22.
[2] Quote from article entitled EVENTS. (assembled notes.), page 226 of George Brecht: Events - A Heterospective, Alfred Fischer, Julia Robinson and Kasper Konig, (Museum Ludwig, Köln, 2006).
[3] Benjamin Patterson in discussion with Emmett Williams, in an article entitled Way Way Way Out, published in the American Army magazine The Stars and Stripes, 30 August 1962

No comments:

Post a Comment